Networks of Power: Cyber Defense and Strategic Security in Pakistan

Networks of Power: Cyber Defense and Strategic Security in Pakistan

Pakistan’s digital transformation is unfolding rapidly, with banks, telecoms, energy providers, and government institutions increasingly dependent on networks and platforms that were peripheral only a decade ago. This shift has brought efficiency and opportunity but also unprecedented vulnerability. Cyber defense, once an afterthought, is now central to national security. The story of Pakistan’s cyber posture is not one of neglect but of uneven progress — institutions have been created, laws have been updated, and international rankings have improved, yet systemic gaps remain that must be addressed if the country is to achieve digital sovereignty in the twenty-first century.

In recent years, Pakistan has made strides that deserve recognition. The creation of the Pakistan Computer Emergency Response Team has given the state a technical node for issuing advisories and handling incidents. The establishment of the National Cyber Crimes Investigation Agency in 2024, replacing the FIA’s overburdened cyber wing, has strengthened enforcement and digital forensics. The inauguration of the National Intelligence Fusion and Threat Assessment Centre in 2025 reflects an understanding that disparate streams of data must be fused to form a coherent picture of threats in real time. The National Centre for Cyber Security continues to operate as an academic hub for research and capacity-building. These are not cosmetic additions. They represent genuine progress, and it is no surprise that Pakistan has climbed in the ITU’s Global Cybersecurity Index, reflecting international acknowledgment of its improvements in law, capacity, and institutional architecture.

Legal reform has also taken place. The Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act of 2016 was overhauled in 2024, with amendments that broadened the definition of cybercrime, streamlined investigative procedures, and brought the law closer to the threats Pakistan was facing at that moment. This revamp was timely and necessary, giving prosecutors and investigators sharper tools and signaling to the international community that Pakistan was serious about aligning its governance framework with contemporary realities. The PECA amendments were an important milestone, and they were one of the factors behind Pakistan’s improved performance in global cyber rankings. Yet even with the overhaul, the pace at which cyber threats evolve continues to outstrip the pace of legislation. Ransomware cartels now operate like global enterprises, state-backed intrusions compromise supply chains with surgical precision, and artificial intelligence introduces novel risks such as data poisoning and adversarial manipulation. Pakistan’s challenge is not the absence of law, but the need for law to remain dynamic. A statute that is refreshed every eight years cannot match adversaries who update their methods every eight weeks.

Institutionally too, progress sits alongside fragmentation. PKCERT, NCCIA, NIFTAC, and NCCS are all valuable, but they remain uncoordinated. The long-promised National Cyber Security Authority, envisioned in the 2021 policy, has yet to be established. Without a central regulator empowered to enforce compliance, mandate audits, and coordinate national responses, these institutions remain effective in isolation but less than the sum of their parts. They are stars without a pole, bright but not aligned. Until NCSA becomes reality, Pakistan’s cyber defense will remain reactive rather than strategic.

Beyond institutions and laws lies a deeper issue: dependence on foreign platforms for the most basic elements of digital life. Messaging is dominated by WhatsApp and Telegram, cloud storage relies on Amazon and Microsoft, Google remains the gatekeeper for search and productivity, and imported hardware powers most of the telecom backbone. In times of peace, this interconnectedness is an advantage. In times of crisis, it is a vulnerability. The recent attacks on Lebanon’s telecommunications systems, which disrupted phones and even pagers, illustrate that communications infrastructure itself can be weaponized. For a country as reliant on mobile networks as Pakistan, such a disruption would be destabilizing.

Cyber defense, therefore, cannot stop at institutions and statutes; it must include the cultivation of local technology assets. Developing a sovereign national messenger platform is not a question of pride but of resilience. If foreign services are disrupted or manipulated, Pakistan must have its own encrypted, auditable, locally hosted communication channel as a fallback. Similarly, investment in indigenous cloud infrastructure, digital payment systems, and even localized search capabilities would reduce dependence on foreign platforms and stimulate domestic innovation. China’s Baidu and WeChat, Russia’s Yandex and VKontakte, and Europe’s GAIA-X initiative all represent different approaches to the same problem: digital sovereignty requires local systems. Pakistan need not replicate these models wholesale, but it must recognize the logic they embody. Sovereignty is diluted when the very platforms that carry a nation’s communications and data are governed from outside.

Artificial intelligence compounds this challenge. AI is already embedded in fraud detection, energy optimization, and national security analytics. But AI is not a silver bullet; it is also a target. Poisoned data can corrupt models, adversarial inputs can manipulate outputs, and insecure deployment can automate vulnerabilities at scale. If Pakistan deploys AI without establishing safety protocols, it risks magnifying its weaknesses rather than addressing them. Investing in AI safety research, developing national standards for AI auditing, and training specialists in adversarial testing are as important as investing in hardware or firewalls. Leading powers are racing to shape global norms on AI safety; Pakistan should not remain a passive consumer. To protect itself and to have a voice in future governance, it must embed AI safety into its cyber defense strategy.

The battlefield of the future will not be confined to servers and software. Satellites that power GPS, manage financial transactions, enable defense communications, and forecast weather are all vulnerable to cyber intrusions, jamming, and spoofing. Pakistan’s reliance on both domestic and foreign satellite infrastructure makes this a frontier that cannot be ignored. A single compromised satellite link could disrupt aviation, paralyze financial clearing, or blind military command. Cyber defense must therefore extend into orbit, securing space assets as zealously as terrestrial networks.

Modern conflicts also show that drones are as much about signals as about wings. From Ukraine to the Middle East, unmanned systems have been blinded, spoofed, or hijacked through cyber means. For Pakistan, which has already seen drones play a role in its tense standoffs with India, this is not theoretical. A drone fleet is only as effective as the encryption of its links, the resilience of its GPS, and the integrity of its command systems. Cyber defense is what keeps drones from being jammed, misdirected, or turned against their operators. At the same time, cyber capabilities can be used offensively to cripple enemy UAVs and other strategic assets — misdirecting their paths, intercepting their feeds, or overwhelming their control nodes. The same logic applies to satellites, aircraft, and missile systems that rely on networked communications. Protecting one’s own systems while probing for weaknesses in an adversary’s is part of the same continuum. For Pakistan, building layered cyber defenses means not only securing its own skies but also holding the ability to disrupt enemy lines when deterrence demands it.

This strategic trajectory cannot succeed without a strong academic backbone. Pakistan already has dozens of universities offering cybersecurity programs, producing graduates who can join industry and government alike. But there is a difference between cybersecurity in the narrow sense — defending networks and systems — and cyber defense in the strategic sense, which blends military doctrine, statecraft, and technology. Programs that prepare students specifically for cyber defense are still lacking. Countries such as the UAE have recognized this gap, with institutions like the Dubai Policy Academy launching advanced degrees in cybersecurity to train professionals not just as technicians but as strategists. Pakistan’s universities could follow a similar path, embedding cyber defense into curricula, launching specialized master’s programs, and integrating research labs with defense and intelligence agencies. A country that invests in human capital at this level is not just protecting its networks; it is cultivating the next generation of cyber strategists capable of defending sovereignty in the digital century.

Against this backdrop of challenges, it is important not to lose sight of Pakistan’s achievements. The creation of dedicated institutions, the 2024 overhaul of PECA, the climb in international rankings, and the growing recognition among businesses and government agencies that cybersecurity is a strategic necessity all represent progress. The country is no longer absent from the global conversation; it is increasingly seen as a participant. That is not insignificant. The task now is to turn progress into coherence. Pakistan must continue to update its laws, establish its long-delayed National Cyber Security Authority, invest in local technology platforms, embed AI safety protocols, develop academic depth, and extend defense planning to drones, telecom, and satellite systems.

The narrative of Pakistan’s cyber defense is not one of failure but of transition. It has moved from neglect to awareness, from absence to presence. The next leap must be from fragmentation to strategy. In cyberspace, sovereignty is not only about preventing attacks; it is about ensuring that a nation’s digital arteries, from messengers to drones to satellites, are secure, resilient, and governed in its own interest. Pakistan has taken important steps. The challenge is to quicken the pace before the threats outstrip the reforms.

Follow the SPIN IDG WhatsApp Channel for updates across the Smart Pakistan Insights Network covering all of Pakistan’s technology ecosystem. 

Post Comment